Dr. Michael Logan has an article in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (PACA)

KENNESAW, Ga. (May 18, 2021)

Dr. Michael Logan
Dr. Michael Logan
Dr. Michael Logan, Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice, and his colleagues at the University of Nebraska Omaha recently co-authored a publication in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (PACA). PACA, published by American Psychological Association, is in the top one-third of academic journals in the Psychology – Experimental category and currently has a 5-year impact factor of 2.75. The article, titled “Constraints to Malevolent Innovation in Terrorist Attacks”, examines how internal and external constraints influence the novelty and relevance dimensions of malevolent innovation in terrorist attacks. The results suggest that given their malleability, internal constraints generally increase malevolent innovation compared to external constraints. However, both internal and external constraints may also negatively affect both the novelty and/or relevance dimensions of malevolent innovation. 

Abstract: Creativity has been considered the driving force of organizational change. Despite the benevolent nature of creativity, the success of organizations fostering a creative product may be used for malevolent purposes. This two-part study explores the constraints to malevolent innovation in the context of terrorism. Drawing from a large sample of terrorist attacks coded for creativity and innovation, study 1 focuses on the relationship between weapon and target characteristics of terrorist attacks and the novelty and relevance dimensions of malevolent innovation. Building on this, study 2 explores how different types of internal and external constraints manifest in terrorist attacks. In line with recent theory, the results suggest that internal constraints motivate the use of novel tactics in terrorist attacks. However, both internal and external constraints can also lead to failures, ultimately diminishing the functional relevance of the attack. Conclusions from this study extend the theory of constraints to the novel arena of terrorist research and provide a new lens from which to understand the failures and successes of terrorist attacks.  

©